Comparison

Cabecero de lomo vs Longaniza Linguica

Overall, Cabecero de lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCabecero de lomoLonganiza Linguica
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 270 kcal 505 kcal
Fat 16 g 41 g
Saturated fat 6.7 g 16 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.7 g
Salt 4.4 g 3.7 g
Protein 31 g 32 g
Additives43
AllergensNone listedPork

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cabecero de lomo has 47% fewer calories (270 kcal vs 505 kcal).
  • Cabecero de lomo has 61% less fat (16 g vs 41 g).
  • Cabecero de lomo has 58% less saturated fat (6.7 g vs 16 g).
  • Longaniza Linguica has 16% less salt (3.7 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Only Longaniza Linguica lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Cabecero de lomo

Cabecero de lomo de cerdo, sal, pimentones, dextrosa, antioxidantes (E-331,E-301), aromas, ajo, especias y conservadores (E-250, E-252).

Longaniza Linguica

pork, bacon, salt, dextrin, dextrose, spices, flavorings, maltodextrin, antioxidant (e-301) and preservative (e-250), edible collagen wrap, packaged in protective atmosphere,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cabecero de lomo or Longaniza Linguica?

Overall, Cabecero de lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cabecero de lomo has fewer calories: 270 kcal versus 505 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cabecero de lomo has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons