Comparison
British Shallots vs Echalote BIO
Overall, British Shallots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | British Shallots | Echalote BIO |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 23 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- British Shallots has 70% fewer calories (23 kcal vs 77 kcal).
- British Shallots has 88% less fat (0.5 g vs 4.1 g).
- British Shallots has 83% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- British Shallots has 24% less sugar (3.1 g vs 4.1 g).
- Echalote BIO has 36% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.4 g).
- British Shallots is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
British Shallots
Shallots
Echalote BIO
Echalote bio 95%, huile de tournesol bio.
FAQ
Which is healthier: British Shallots or Echalote BIO?
Overall, British Shallots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
British Shallots has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
British Shallots has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.