Comparison
British Shallots vs Echalote
Overall, Echalote has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | British Shallots | Echalote |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 23 kcal | 75 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- British Shallots has 69% fewer calories (23 kcal vs 75 kcal).
- Echalote has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Echalote has no sugar, while British Shallots has 3.1 g.
- Echalote has 36% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
British Shallots
Shallots
Echalote
Échalote
FAQ
Which is healthier: British Shallots or Echalote?
Overall, Echalote has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
British Shallots has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 75 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Echalote has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.