Comparison
British Curly Kale vs Boerenkool
Overall, Boerenkool has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | British Curly Kale | Boerenkool |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 40 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Boerenkool has 18% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 40 kcal).
- Boerenkool has 63% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.6 g).
- Boerenkool has 69% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.3 g).
- Boerenkool has 34% more fiber (4.7 g vs 3.1 g).
- British Curly Kale has 12% more protein (3.4 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
British Curly Kale
Curly kale.
Boerenkool
Boerenkool. Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.00g per 100 gram
FAQ
Which is healthier: British Curly Kale or Boerenkool?
Overall, Boerenkool has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Boerenkool has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 40 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boerenkool has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.