Comparison
Boerenkool vs Boerenkool
Overall, Boerenkool has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boerenkool | Boerenkool |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 33 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 4.7 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Boerenkool has 54% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Boerenkool has 56% less sugar (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Boerenkool has 84% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Boerenkool has 26% more fiber (4.7 g vs 3.5 g).
- Boerenkool is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Boerenkool
Boerenkool. Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.00g per 100 gram
Boerenkool
boerenkool, water, zout
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boerenkool or Boerenkool?
Overall, Boerenkool has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Boerenkool has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boerenkool has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.