Comparison

Boysenberry vs Gemüse à la Oriental

Overall, Gemüse à la Oriental has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBoysenberryGemüse à la Oriental
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 355 kcal 87 kcal
Fat 1.2 g 4.9 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.4 g
Sugars 62.2 g 3.6 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.6 g
Fiber 13.4 g 3.1 g
Protein 4.7 g 2.1 g
Additives00
AllergensOrangeNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gemüse à la Oriental has 75% fewer calories (87 kcal vs 355 kcal).
  • Boysenberry has 76% less fat (1.2 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Gemüse à la Oriental has 94% less sugar (3.6 g vs 62.2 g).
  • Boysenberry has 77% more fiber (13.4 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Boysenberry has 55% more protein (4.7 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Gemüse à la Oriental has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Boysenberry lists: Orange.

Ingredients

Boysenberry

Banane, Pomme, mangue, fraise, orange, myrtille, betterave, carotte, citron, datte

Gemüse à la Oriental

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Boysenberry or Gemüse à la Oriental?

Overall, Gemüse à la Oriental has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gemüse à la Oriental has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gemüse à la Oriental has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 62.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons