Boysenberry vs Gemüse à la Oriental
Overall, Gemüse à la Oriental has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boysenberry | Gemüse à la Oriental |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 87 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 4.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 62.2 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 13.4 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 4.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Orange | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gemüse à la Oriental has 75% fewer calories (87 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- Boysenberry has 76% less fat (1.2 g vs 4.9 g).
- Gemüse à la Oriental has 94% less sugar (3.6 g vs 62.2 g).
- Boysenberry has 77% more fiber (13.4 g vs 3.1 g).
- Boysenberry has 55% more protein (4.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Gemüse à la Oriental has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Boysenberry lists: Orange.
Ingredients
Boysenberry
Banane, Pomme, mangue, fraise, orange, myrtille, betterave, carotte, citron, datte
Gemüse à la Oriental
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boysenberry or Gemüse à la Oriental?
Overall, Gemüse à la Oriental has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gemüse à la Oriental has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gemüse à la Oriental has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 62.2 g per 100 g.