Boudin de porc noir de Bigorre vs Kalbs Cipollata
Overall, Kalbs Cipollata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boudin de porc noir de Bigor... | Kalbs Cipollata |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 237 kcal | 192 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 5.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 18.9 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kalbs Cipollata has 19% fewer calories (192 kcal vs 237 kcal).
- Kalbs Cipollata has 12% less fat (15 g vs 17 g).
- Kalbs Cipollata has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Boudin de porc noir de Bigorre has 31% more protein (18.9 g vs 13 g).
- Boudin de porc noir de Bigorre is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Boudin de porc noir de Bigorre lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Boudin de porc noir de Bigorre
Tête et viande de Porc Noir de Bigorre AOC, sang, oignons, thym, laurier, épices, farine de _blé_, sel, poivre
Kalbs Cipollata
41% viande de veau, eau, viande de porc, lard, sel de cuis dextrose, sirop de glucose, stabilisants: diphosphates, acétates de sol épices, extraits d'épices. Enveloppe: boyau de mouton. Informati consommateur: la date limite de consommation ne peut être g une température de +5°C max. est maintenue pendant la conservativ transport.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boudin de porc noir de Bigorre or Kalbs Cipollata?
Overall, Kalbs Cipollata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kalbs Cipollata has fewer calories: 192 kcal versus 237 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kalbs Cipollata has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.