Comparison
Bonito del Norte vs TUNA in brine
Overall, Bonito del Norte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bonito del Norte | TUNA in brine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 198 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 20.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- TUNA in brine has 65% fewer calories (70 kcal vs 198 kcal).
- TUNA in brine has 94% less fat (0.6 g vs 10 g).
- TUNA in brine has 97% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 6.4 g).
- Bonito del Norte has 99% less salt (0.3 g vs 20.7 g).
- Bonito del Norte has 41% more protein (27 g vs 16 g).
- Bonito del Norte has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only TUNA in brine lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Bonito del Norte
Not available.
TUNA in brine
tuňák pruhovaný, pitná voda, jedlá sůl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bonito del Norte or TUNA in brine?
Overall, Bonito del Norte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
TUNA in brine has fewer calories: 70 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bonito del Norte has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.