Comparison
Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine vs Bonito del Norte
Overall, Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Br... | Bonito del Norte |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 98 kcal | 198 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 6.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | — |
| Protein | 24 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has 51% fewer calories (98 kcal vs 198 kcal).
- Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has 95% less fat (0.5 g vs 10 g).
- Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has 92% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 6.4 g).
- Bonito del Norte has no sugar, while Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has 0.5 g.
- Bonito del Norte has 66% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Bonito del Norte has 11% more protein (27 g vs 24 g).
- Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine
Thon listao, eau, sel.
Bonito del Norte
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine or Bonito del Norte?
Overall, Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has fewer calories: 98 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bonito del Norte has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.