Comparison
Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine vs TUNA in brine
Overall, Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Better choice
Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine
Les Doris · 800 g
TUNA in brine
KAISER FRANZ JOSEF EXCLUSIVE · 80 g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Br... | TUNA in brine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 98 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 20.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- TUNA in brine has 29% fewer calories (70 kcal vs 98 kcal).
- TUNA in brine has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- TUNA in brine has no sugar, while Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has 0.5 g.
- Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has 96% less salt (0.9 g vs 20.7 g).
- Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has 33% more protein (24 g vs 16 g).
- Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine
Thon listao, eau, sel.
TUNA in brine
tuňák pruhovaný, pitná voda, jedlá sůl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine or TUNA in brine?
Overall, Skipjack Tuna Chunks - In Brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
TUNA in brine has fewer calories: 70 kcal versus 98 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
TUNA in brine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.