Boeuf haché vs Le Super Tendre à l'oignon
Overall, Boeuf haché has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boeuf haché | Le Super Tendre à l'oignon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 208 kcal | 211 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.3 g | 6.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 16.2 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Beef | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Boeuf haché has no sugar, while Le Super Tendre à l'oignon has 1.1 g.
- Boeuf haché has 43% more fiber (3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Boeuf haché has 20% more protein (16.2 g vs 13 g).
- Only Boeuf haché lists: Beef.
- Only Le Super Tendre à l'oignon lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Boeuf haché
beef (80%), water, pea vegetable fiber, salt, pea starch, natural flavor,
Le Super Tendre à l'oignon
Le super tendre a l'oignon viande de boeuf (48%), proteines de {allergene}soja{/allergene} rehydratees (30%), eau, oignons rehydrates (4%), gras de boeuf, chapelure ({allergene}ble{/allergene}), sel, aromes, maltodextrine, betterave rouge deshydratee. {traces}traces d'oeuf, lait, gluten. pourcentage de matieres grasses inferieur a 15%. rapport collagene sur proteines de viande inferieur a 15%. ce produit ne contient que de la viande de bovins, nes, eleves et abattus en france. elabore en france.{/traces}
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boeuf haché or Le Super Tendre à l'oignon?
Overall, Boeuf haché has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Boeuf haché has fewer calories: 208 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boeuf haché has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.