Comparison
Blé précuit vs Hörnli
Overall, Blé précuit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Blé précuit | Hörnli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 354 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.3 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blé précuit has 80% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Blé précuit has 37% more fiber (6.3 g vs 4 g).
- Blé précuit has 13% more protein (15 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Blé précuit
Blé précuit
Hörnli
semoule de blé dur
FAQ
Which is healthier: Blé précuit or Hörnli?
Overall, Blé précuit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hörnli has fewer calories: 354 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blé précuit has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.