Comparison

Bio zuckermais vs Maïs doux cuit sous-vide

Overall, Bio zuckermais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio zuckermaisMaïs doux cuit sous-vide
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — 3
Calories 103 kcal 109 kcal
Fat 1.3 g 2.8 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.7 g
Sugars 4.8 g 7 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.8 g 5.7 g
Protein 3.4 g 3.2 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio zuckermais has 54% less fat (1.3 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Bio zuckermais has 71% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Bio zuckermais has 31% less sugar (4.8 g vs 7 g).
  • Maïs doux cuit sous-vide has 51% more fiber (5.7 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Only Maïs doux cuit sous-vide lists: None.

Ingredients

Bio zuckermais

Not available.

Maïs doux cuit sous-vide

Mais doux , sel, antioxydant (acide citrique E330).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio zuckermais or Maïs doux cuit sous-vide?

Overall, Bio zuckermais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio zuckermais has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio zuckermais has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons