Maïs doux (×2) vs Bio zuckermais
Overall, Bio zuckermais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maïs doux (×2) | Bio zuckermais |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 109 kcal | 103 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 10 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio zuckermais has 54% less fat (1.3 g vs 2.8 g).
- Bio zuckermais has 71% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Bio zuckermais has 31% less sugar (4.8 g vs 7 g).
- Bio zuckermais has no salt, while Maïs doux (×2) has 10 g.
- Bio zuckermais has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Maïs doux (×2)
Not available.
Bio zuckermais
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maïs doux (×2) or Bio zuckermais?
Overall, Bio zuckermais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio zuckermais has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio zuckermais has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 7 g per 100 g.