Bio zuckermais vs Pannocchie di mais dolce biologiche e cotte al vapore
Overall, Bio zuckermais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Bio zuckermais
Pannocchie di mais dolce biologiche e cotte al vapore
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio zuckermais | Pannocchie di mais dolce bio... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 103 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio zuckermais has 54% less fat (1.3 g vs 2.8 g).
- Bio zuckermais has 71% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Bio zuckermais has 31% less sugar (4.8 g vs 7 g).
- Pannocchie di mais dolce biologiche e cotte al vapore has 49% more fiber (5.5 g vs 2.8 g).
Ingredients
Bio zuckermais
Not available.
Pannocchie di mais dolce biologiche e cotte al vapore
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio zuckermais or Pannocchie di mais dolce biologiche e cotte al vapore?
Overall, Bio zuckermais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio zuckermais has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio zuckermais has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 7 g per 100 g.