Comparison

Bio-Brotaufstrich - Paprika-Trio vs Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilikum

Overall, Bio-Brotaufstrich - Paprika-Trio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio-Brotaufstrich - Paprika-...Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilik...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 231 kcal 224 kcal
Fat 18 g 18 g
Saturated fat 1.9 g 2 g
Sugars 6.5 g 6.4 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.1 g
Fiber 2.5 g 1.6 g
Protein 5.1 g 4.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio-Brotaufstrich - Paprika-Trio has 36% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Only Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilikum lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Bio-Brotaufstrich - Paprika-Trio

Rote Paprika* 49%, Sonnenblumenkerne*, Sonnenblumenöl*, gelbe Paprika* 9%, grüne Paprika* 4%, Agavendicksaft*, Tomatenmark* 3%, getrocknete Tomaten* 2% (Tomaten*, Salz), Kartoffelstärke*, Zitronensaftkonzentrat*, Meersalz, Zwiebelpulver*, Knoblauchpulver*, Paprikapulver*, Verdickungsmittel: Johannisbrotkernmehl*, weißer Pfeffer*

Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilikum

31% Tomatenmark' doppelt konzentriert, 20% passierte Tomaten, Wasser, Sonnenblumenöl, Sonnenblumenkerne, 3,5% Basilikum, Sojasauce (Wasser, Sojabohne, Speisesalz), Meersalz, Rohrzucker', Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Reisgrieß, Stärke, Kraüter, Gewürze. aus kontrolliert ökologischer Landwirtschaft.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio-Brotaufstrich - Paprika-Trio or Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilikum?

Overall, Bio-Brotaufstrich - Paprika-Trio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilikum has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 231 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilikum has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons