Comparison

Tartinade de legumes Trio de poivrons vs Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilikum

Overall, Tartinade de legumes Trio de poivrons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTartinade de legumes Trio de...Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilik...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 231 kcal 224 kcal
Fat 18 g 18 g
Saturated fat 1.9 g 2 g
Sugars 6.5 g 6.4 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.1 g
Fiber 2.5 g 1.6 g
Protein 5.1 g 4.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tartinade de legumes Trio de poivrons has 36% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Only Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilikum lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Tartinade de legumes Trio de poivrons

Poivrons rouges jaunes et verts, graines de tournesol, huile de tournesol, sirop d’agave, purée de tomates, tomates séchées, amidon de pommes de terre, jus concentré de citron, sel marin, épices, oignons en poudre, farine de graines de caroube * Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique

Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilikum

31% Tomatenmark' doppelt konzentriert, 20% passierte Tomaten, Wasser, Sonnenblumenöl, Sonnenblumenkerne, 3,5% Basilikum, Sojasauce (Wasser, Sojabohne, Speisesalz), Meersalz, Rohrzucker', Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Reisgrieß, Stärke, Kraüter, Gewürze. aus kontrolliert ökologischer Landwirtschaft.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tartinade de legumes Trio de poivrons or Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilikum?

Overall, Tartinade de legumes Trio de poivrons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilikum has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 231 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Brotaufstrich Tomate Basilikum has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons