Comparison

Bel Ara vs Roasted makahna

Overall, Roasted makahna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBel AraRoasted makahna
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 460 kcal 480 kcal
Fat 24 g 20 g
Saturated fat 3 g 2 g
Sugars 4 g 2 g
Salt 2 g 2.2 g
Fiber 9 g 4 g
Protein 12 g 7 g
Additives10
AllergensSesame seedsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Roasted makahna has 17% less fat (20 g vs 24 g).
  • Roasted makahna has 33% less saturated fat (2 g vs 3 g).
  • Roasted makahna has 50% less sugar (2 g vs 4 g).
  • Bel Ara has 56% more fiber (9 g vs 4 g).
  • Bel Ara has 42% more protein (12 g vs 7 g).
  • Only Bel Ara lists: Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Bel Ara

Harina de maíz nixtamalizada, aceite vegetal (contiene TBHQ), harina de chicharo 9%, almidón modificado, semilla de ajonjolí, semilla de linaza, semilla de girasol, amaranto, semilla de quinoa, sazonador para botanas, arroz inflado, cilantro deshidratado, limón en polvo y sal de mar yodada. Puede contener: Trazas de cacahuate, almendra, nueces, lácteos, soya y gluten.

Roasted makahna

OM trition Information The Jolydale (3) Dean Fiber (s) 20 8820 89 Sugar (3) des Added Sugar (@1 5% 番茄 T 165 236 8.6% 08 S 6500 2.8% tells you how much a nuent in a serving of food contributes to a da for general nutrition advice. dietary allowance is acuated on the basis of

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bel Ara or Roasted makahna?

Overall, Roasted makahna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bel Ara has fewer calories: 460 kcal versus 480 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Roasted makahna has less sugar: 2 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons