Comparison
Bandnudeln vs Amendoa sem pele
Overall, Amendoa sem pele has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bandnudeln | Amendoa sem pele |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 708 kcal | 594 kcal |
| Fat | 68 g | 51 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.7 g | 8.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 4.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 7.7 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amendoa sem pele has 16% fewer calories (594 kcal vs 708 kcal).
- Amendoa sem pele has 25% less fat (51 g vs 68 g).
- Bandnudeln has 18% less saturated fat (6.7 g vs 8.2 g).
- Bandnudeln has 44% less sugar (2.4 g vs 4.3 g).
- Amendoa sem pele has 35% more fiber (7.7 g vs 5 g).
- Amendoa sem pele has 39% more protein (28 g vs 17 g).
Ingredients
Bandnudeln
Not available.
Amendoa sem pele
AMÊNDOA crua sem pele AMENDOIM, OUTROS FRUTOS DE QUE CONTEM
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bandnudeln or Amendoa sem pele?
Overall, Amendoa sem pele has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amendoa sem pele has fewer calories: 594 kcal versus 708 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bandnudeln has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.