Comparison

Baking Powder vs Plain flour

Overall, Baking Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBaking PowderPlain flour
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 161 kcal 354 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 1.3 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.9 g
Sugars 0.3 g 1.9 g
Salt 35.7 g 0 g
Fiber 2.9 g 2.2 g
Protein 3.5 g 10 g
Additives40
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Baking Powder has 55% fewer calories (161 kcal vs 354 kcal).
  • Baking Powder has 46% less fat (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Baking Powder has 78% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Baking Powder has 84% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Plain flour has 100% less salt (0 g vs 35.7 g).
  • Baking Powder has 24% more fiber (2.9 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Plain flour has 65% more protein (10 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Plain flour is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Baking Powder

Raising agents, disodium diphosphate, sodium hydrogen carbonate, wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin.

Plain flour

Wheat Flour

FAQ

Which is healthier: Baking Powder or Plain flour?

Overall, Baking Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Baking Powder has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Baking Powder has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons