Bakarwadi vs Mélange à l'espagnole
Overall, Mélange à l'espagnole has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bakarwadi | Mélange à l'espagnole |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 544 kcal | 328 kcal |
| Fat | 36 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 9 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 20 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Sesame seeds | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mélange à l'espagnole has 40% fewer calories (328 kcal vs 544 kcal).
- Mélange à l'espagnole has 89% less fat (4 g vs 36 g).
- Mélange à l'espagnole has 89% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 8 g).
- Bakarwadi has 18% less sugar (9 g vs 11 g).
- Mélange à l'espagnole has 90% less salt (0.2 g vs 2 g).
- Mélange à l'espagnole has 75% more fiber (20 g vs 5 g).
- Mélange à l'espagnole has 36% more protein (14 g vs 9 g).
- Only Bakarwadi lists: Gluten, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Bakarwadi
Refined Wheat Flour (Maida), Bengal Gram Flour, Refined Groundnut Oil, Sugar Syrup (Refined Sugar, Water), Refined Sugar, Green Chilli, Iodised Salt, Coriander Leaves, Grated Desiccated Coconut, Spices (Red Chilli Powder, Cumin Seed Powder, Coriander Seed Powder, Asafoetida), Tamarind Concentrate, Coriander Leaf Extract, Sesame Seeds.
Mélange à l'espagnole
Ducros MÉLANGE W L'ESPAGNOLE Spaanse Stijl Mix
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bakarwadi or Mélange à l'espagnole?
Overall, Mélange à l'espagnole has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mélange à l'espagnole has fewer calories: 328 kcal versus 544 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bakarwadi has less sugar: 9 g versus 11 g per 100 g.