Comparison

Bacon Ahumado Natural vs Bacon Cintas

Overall, Bacon Cintas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBacon Ahumado NaturalBacon Cintas
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 386 kcal 293 kcal
Fat 36 g 25 g
Saturated fat 12 g 9.9 g
Sugars 1.4 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.8 g 2.1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 14 g 16.6 g
Additives32
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bacon Cintas has 24% fewer calories (293 kcal vs 386 kcal).
  • Bacon Cintas has 31% less fat (25 g vs 36 g).
  • Bacon Cintas has 17% less saturated fat (9.9 g vs 12 g).
  • Bacon Cintas has 64% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Bacon Cintas has 25% less salt (2.1 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Bacon Cintas has 16% more protein (16.6 g vs 14 g).

Ingredients

Bacon Ahumado Natural

pork belly 96%, salt, sugar, e451, e316, e250

Bacon Cintas

Panceta de cerdo (98%), sal, dextrosa, estabilizante (E-451i), antioxidante (ascorbato sódico), extracto de especias, conservador (nitrito sódico).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bacon Ahumado Natural or Bacon Cintas?

Overall, Bacon Cintas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bacon Cintas has fewer calories: 293 kcal versus 386 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bacon Cintas has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons