Bacón ahumado con madera de haya vs Bacon Cintas
Overall, Bacon Cintas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bacón ahumado con madera de... | Bacon Cintas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 289 kcal | 293 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 9.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 16.6 g |
| Additives | 7 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bacon Cintas has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Bacón ahumado con madera de haya
panceta de cerdo 95%, sal, conservador E326, conservador E243, conservador E250, dextrosa, jarabe de glucosa, estabilizante E451, estabilizante E450, antioxidante E331, antioxidante E301, aromas, extracto de especias, Ahumado con madera de haya,
Bacon Cintas
Panceta de cerdo (98%), sal, dextrosa, estabilizante (E-451i), antioxidante (ascorbato sódico), extracto de especias, conservador (nitrito sódico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bacón ahumado con madera de haya or Bacon Cintas?
Overall, Bacon Cintas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bacón ahumado con madera de haya has fewer calories: 289 kcal versus 293 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bacon Cintas has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.