Bacon Ahumado Natural vs Bacón ahumado con madera de haya
Overall, Bacón ahumado con madera de haya has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Bacon Ahumado Natural
Bacón ahumado con madera de haya
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bacon Ahumado Natural | Bacón ahumado con madera de... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 386 kcal | 289 kcal |
| Fat | 36 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 9 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 3 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bacón ahumado con madera de haya has 25% fewer calories (289 kcal vs 386 kcal).
- Bacón ahumado con madera de haya has 31% less fat (25 g vs 36 g).
- Bacón ahumado con madera de haya has 25% less saturated fat (9 g vs 12 g).
- Bacón ahumado con madera de haya has 43% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- Bacón ahumado con madera de haya has 16% less salt (2.4 g vs 2.8 g).
Ingredients
Bacon Ahumado Natural
pork belly 96%, salt, sugar, e451, e316, e250
Bacón ahumado con madera de haya
panceta de cerdo 95%, sal, conservador E326, conservador E243, conservador E250, dextrosa, jarabe de glucosa, estabilizante E451, estabilizante E450, antioxidante E331, antioxidante E301, aromas, extracto de especias, Ahumado con madera de haya,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bacon Ahumado Natural or Bacón ahumado con madera de haya?
Overall, Bacón ahumado con madera de haya has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bacón ahumado con madera de haya has fewer calories: 289 kcal versus 386 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bacón ahumado con madera de haya has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.