Bacon ahumado con madera de haya vs Bacon Cintas
Overall, Bacon Cintas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bacon ahumado con madera de... | Bacon Cintas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 349 kcal | 293 kcal |
| Fat | 31.7 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.7 g | 9.9 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 14.9 g | 16.6 g |
| Additives | 7 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bacon Cintas has 16% fewer calories (293 kcal vs 349 kcal).
- Bacon Cintas has 21% less fat (25 g vs 31.7 g).
- Bacon Cintas has 22% less saturated fat (9.9 g vs 12.7 g).
- Bacon Cintas has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Bacon Cintas has 10% more protein (16.6 g vs 14.9 g).
Ingredients
Bacon ahumado con madera de haya
Bacon de cerdo, sal, dextrosa, estabilizantes (E451, E452), conservadores (E262, E243, E250), extractos de especies, azúcar , antioxidante (E316, E301).
Bacon Cintas
Panceta de cerdo (98%), sal, dextrosa, estabilizante (E-451i), antioxidante (ascorbato sódico), extracto de especias, conservador (nitrito sódico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bacon ahumado con madera de haya or Bacon Cintas?
Overall, Bacon Cintas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bacon Cintas has fewer calories: 293 kcal versus 349 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bacon Cintas has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.