Comparison

6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers vs Bacon Cintas

Overall, 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient6 Smoked Back Bacon RashersBacon Cintas
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 237 kcal 293 kcal
Fat 13 g 25 g
Saturated fat 5.6 g 9.9 g
Sugars 1.1 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.8 g 2.1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 28 g 16.6 g
Additives02
AllergensPorkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 19% fewer calories (237 kcal vs 293 kcal).
  • 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 48% less fat (13 g vs 25 g).
  • 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 43% less saturated fat (5.6 g vs 9.9 g).
  • Bacon Cintas has 55% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Bacon Cintas has 24% less salt (2.1 g vs 2.8 g).
  • 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 41% more protein (28 g vs 16.6 g).
  • Only 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers lists: Pork.

Ingredients

6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers

pork (91%), water, salt, natural flavouring, ascorbic acid, smoke flavouring

Bacon Cintas

Panceta de cerdo (98%), sal, dextrosa, estabilizante (E-451i), antioxidante (ascorbato sódico), extracto de especias, conservador (nitrito sódico).

FAQ

Which is healthier: 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers or Bacon Cintas?

Overall, 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has fewer calories: 237 kcal versus 293 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bacon Cintas has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons