Atún claro al natural vs Thon albacore
Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Atún claro al natural | Thon albacore |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 114 kcal | 190 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 9.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Atún claro al natural has 40% fewer calories (114 kcal vs 190 kcal).
- Atún claro al natural has 85% less fat (1.4 g vs 9.6 g).
- Atún claro al natural has 80% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Atún claro al natural
Not available.
Thon albacore
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Atún claro al natural or Thon albacore?
Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Atún claro al natural has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Atún claro al natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.