Atún claro vs Atún claro al natural
Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Atún claro | Atún claro al natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 113 kcal | 100 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Atún claro al natural has 12% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 113 kcal).
- Atún claro al natural has 70% less fat (0.9 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Atún claro
Atún claro, agua, sal
Atún claro al natural
Atún claro (Thunnus albacares/T. obesus), agua y sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Atún claro or Atún claro al natural?
Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Atún claro al natural has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 113 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Atún claro has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.