Comparison

Apple and sultana bars vs Nut bar choc abricot

Overall, Apple and sultana bars has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientApple and sultana barsNut bar choc abricot
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 301 kcal 507 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 30.3 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 7.7 g
Sugars 61.2 g 25.4 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.4 g
Fiber 14.4 g —
Protein 3 g 13.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Apple and sultana bars has 41% fewer calories (301 kcal vs 507 kcal).
  • Apple and sultana bars has 98% less fat (0.5 g vs 30.3 g).
  • Apple and sultana bars has 97% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 7.7 g).
  • Nut bar choc abricot has 58% less sugar (25.4 g vs 61.2 g).
  • Nut bar choc abricot has 78% more protein (13.7 g vs 3 g).
  • Apple and sultana bars has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Apple and sultana bars

Date, Dried Apple (33%), Sultanas (16%)

Nut bar choc abricot

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Apple and sultana bars or Nut bar choc abricot?

Overall, Apple and sultana bars has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Apple and sultana bars has fewer calories: 301 kcal versus 507 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Nut bar choc abricot has less sugar: 25.4 g versus 61.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons