Comparison

Anacardo Tostado Sal vs Filets de maquerau blanc grilles

Overall, Filets de maquerau blanc grilles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAnacardo Tostado SalFilets de maquerau blanc gri...
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group — 3
Calories 621 kcal 140 kcal
Fat 50.2 g 3.7 g
Saturated fat 9.3 g 1.1 g
Sugars 5.6 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0.9 g
Fiber 3.8 g 0 g
Protein 18.6 g 26.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de maquerau blanc grilles has 77% fewer calories (140 kcal vs 621 kcal).
  • Filets de maquerau blanc grilles has 93% less fat (3.7 g vs 50.2 g).
  • Filets de maquerau blanc grilles has 88% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 9.3 g).
  • Filets de maquerau blanc grilles has no sugar, while Anacardo Tostado Sal has 5.6 g.
  • Anacardo Tostado Sal has no salt, while Filets de maquerau blanc grilles has 0.9 g.
  • Anacardo Tostado Sal has 100% more fiber (3.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Filets de maquerau blanc grilles has 30% more protein (26.6 g vs 18.6 g).
  • Filets de maquerau blanc grilles has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Filets de maquerau blanc grilles lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Anacardo Tostado Sal

Not available.

Filets de maquerau blanc grilles

71% filets de maquereau (poisson), eau, sel. Traces éventuelles de moutarde. Non ouvert,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Anacardo Tostado Sal or Filets de maquerau blanc grilles?

Overall, Filets de maquerau blanc grilles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de maquerau blanc grilles has fewer calories: 140 kcal versus 621 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de maquerau blanc grilles has less sugar: 0 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons