Amarenakirschen vs Sauerkirschen
Overall, Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amarenakirschen | Sauerkirschen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 286 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 54.6 g | 13.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sauerkirschen has 75% fewer calories (71 kcal vs 286 kcal).
- Amarenakirschen has no fat, while Sauerkirschen has 1.1 g.
- Amarenakirschen has no saturated fat, while Sauerkirschen has 0.5 g.
- Sauerkirschen has 76% less sugar (13.2 g vs 54.6 g).
- Sauerkirschen has 100% more protein (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Sauerkirschen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Sauerkirschen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Amarenakirschen
51% Sauerkirschen, Zucker, Wasser, Glukosesirup, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff: Anthocyane.
Sauerkirschen
Vişine fără sâmburi, apă, zahăr.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amarenakirschen or Sauerkirschen?
Overall, Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sauerkirschen has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 286 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sauerkirschen has less sugar: 13.2 g versus 54.6 g per 100 g.