Comparison
Sauerkirschen vs Sauerkirschen
Overall, Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sauerkirschen | Sauerkirschen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 64 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 13.2 g | 13 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sauerkirschen has 91% less fat (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
- Sauerkirschen has no saturated fat, while Sauerkirschen has 0.5 g.
- Sauerkirschen has 56% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.8 g).
- Sauerkirschen has 33% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.6 g).
- Sauerkirschen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sauerkirschen
Vişine fără sâmburi, apă, zahăr.
Sauerkirschen
Sauerkirschen, Wasser, Zucker.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sauerkirschen or Sauerkirschen?
Overall, Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sauerkirschen has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sauerkirschen has less sugar: 13 g versus 13.2 g per 100 g.