Comparison
Süßkirschen vs Sauerkirschen
Overall, Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Süßkirschen
River Valley · Füllmenge: 680g Abtropfgewicht: 360g
Better choice 
Sauerkirschen
Beste Ernte · 350g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Süßkirschen | Sauerkirschen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 64 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 15.8 g | 13 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sauerkirschen has 25% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 85 kcal).
- Sauerkirschen has 18% less sugar (13 g vs 15.8 g).
- Süßkirschen has 70% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Sauerkirschen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Süßkirschen
Süßkirschen, Wasser, Zucker, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure.
Sauerkirschen
Sauerkirschen, Wasser, Zucker.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Süßkirschen or Sauerkirschen?
Overall, Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sauerkirschen has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sauerkirschen has less sugar: 13 g versus 15.8 g per 100 g.