Süßkirschen vs Cerise Bigarreau
Overall, Cerise Bigarreau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Süßkirschen
Cerise Bigarreau
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Süßkirschen | Cerise Bigarreau |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 67 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 15.8 g | 13 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cerise Bigarreau has 21% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 85 kcal).
- Cerise Bigarreau has 18% less sugar (13 g vs 15.8 g).
- Süßkirschen has 64% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Cerise Bigarreau has the better Nutri-Score.
- Süßkirschen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cerise Bigarreau lists: None.
Ingredients
Süßkirschen
Süßkirschen, Wasser, Zucker, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure.
Cerise Bigarreau
Bigarreaux entiers, eau, sucre, jus concentré de carotte pourpre, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Süßkirschen or Cerise Bigarreau?
Overall, Cerise Bigarreau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cerise Bigarreau has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cerise Bigarreau has less sugar: 13 g versus 15.8 g per 100 g.