Comparison

Cerise Bigarreau vs Sauerkirschen

Overall, Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Cerise Bigarreau	Sauerkirschen
Nutri-Score	b	b
NOVA group	4	3
Calories	67 kcal	64 kcal
Fat	0 g	0.1 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0 g
Sugars	13 g	13 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	0.9 g	0.8 g
Protein	0.7 g	0.9 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Sauerkirschen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Only Cerise Bigarreau lists: None.

Ingredients

Cerise Bigarreau

Bigarreaux entiers, eau, sucre, jus concentré de carotte pourpre, arôme naturel.

Sauerkirschen

Sauerkirschen, Wasser, Zucker.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cerise Bigarreau or Sauerkirschen?

Overall, Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sauerkirschen has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 67 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cerise Bigarreau has less sugar: 13 g versus 13 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Amarenakirschen vs Cerise Bigarreau Amarenakirschen vs Sauerkirschen Cerise Bigarreau vs Sauerkirschen Cerise Bigarreau vs Luxardo The Original Mar... Cerise Bigarreau vs Cerezas en almíbar denso Süßkirschen vs Cerise Bigarreau Cerise Bigarreau vs Cerises dénoyautées au s... Sauerkirschen vs Sauerkirschen