Amarenakirschen vs Cerise Bigarreau
Overall, Cerise Bigarreau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amarenakirschen | Cerise Bigarreau |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 286 kcal | 67 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 54.6 g | 13 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cerise Bigarreau has 77% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 286 kcal).
- Cerise Bigarreau has 76% less sugar (13 g vs 54.6 g).
- Cerise Bigarreau has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Cerise Bigarreau has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Cerise Bigarreau lists: None.
Ingredients
Amarenakirschen
51% Sauerkirschen, Zucker, Wasser, Glukosesirup, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff: Anthocyane.
Cerise Bigarreau
Bigarreaux entiers, eau, sucre, jus concentré de carotte pourpre, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amarenakirschen or Cerise Bigarreau?
Overall, Cerise Bigarreau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cerise Bigarreau has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 286 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cerise Bigarreau has less sugar: 13 g versus 54.6 g per 100 g.