Amarenakirschen vs Cerezas en almíbar denso
Overall, Cerezas en almíbar denso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Amarenakirschen
Cerezas en almíbar denso
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amarenakirschen | Cerezas en almíbar denso |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 286 kcal | 205 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 54.6 g | 48.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cerezas en almíbar denso has 28% fewer calories (205 kcal vs 286 kcal).
- Cerezas en almíbar denso has 11% less sugar (48.5 g vs 54.6 g).
- Cerezas en almíbar denso has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Amarenakirschen
51% Sauerkirschen, Zucker, Wasser, Glukosesirup, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff: Anthocyane.
Cerezas en almíbar denso
Cerezas, azúcar, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa, acidulante (ácido cítrico), colorantes (E127, E120).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amarenakirschen or Cerezas en almíbar denso?
Overall, Cerezas en almíbar denso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cerezas en almíbar denso has fewer calories: 205 kcal versus 286 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cerezas en almíbar denso has less sugar: 48.5 g versus 54.6 g per 100 g.