Sauerkirschen vs Cerezas en almíbar denso
Overall, Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Sauerkirschen
Cerezas en almíbar denso
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sauerkirschen | Cerezas en almíbar denso |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 205 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 13.2 g | 48.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sauerkirschen has 65% fewer calories (71 kcal vs 205 kcal).
- Cerezas en almíbar denso has no fat, while Sauerkirschen has 1.1 g.
- Cerezas en almíbar denso has no saturated fat, while Sauerkirschen has 0.5 g.
- Sauerkirschen has 73% less sugar (13.2 g vs 48.5 g).
- Sauerkirschen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Sauerkirschen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sauerkirschen
Vişine fără sâmburi, apă, zahăr.
Cerezas en almíbar denso
Cerezas, azúcar, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa, acidulante (ácido cítrico), colorantes (E127, E120).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sauerkirschen or Cerezas en almíbar denso?
Overall, Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sauerkirschen has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 205 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sauerkirschen has less sugar: 13.2 g versus 48.5 g per 100 g.