Comparison

Cerise Bigarreau vs Sauerkirschen

Overall, Cerise Bigarreau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Better choice
Cerise Bigarreau

Cerise Bigarreau

St Mamet · 425 g
b NOVA 4
Sauerkirschen

Sauerkirschen

Freshona · 350g
c NOVA 3

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCerise BigarreauSauerkirschen
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 67 kcal 71 kcal
Fat 0 g 1.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.5 g
Sugars 13 g 13.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.9 g 1.7 g
Protein 0.7 g 0.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNoneNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cerise Bigarreau has no fat, while Sauerkirschen has 1.1 g.
  • Cerise Bigarreau has no saturated fat, while Sauerkirschen has 0.5 g.
  • Sauerkirschen has 47% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Cerise Bigarreau has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Sauerkirschen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Cerise Bigarreau lists: None.

Ingredients

Cerise Bigarreau

Bigarreaux entiers, eau, sucre, jus concentré de carotte pourpre, arôme naturel.

Sauerkirschen

Vişine fără sâmburi, apă, zahăr.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cerise Bigarreau or Sauerkirschen?

Overall, Cerise Bigarreau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cerise Bigarreau has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cerise Bigarreau has less sugar: 13 g versus 13.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Amarenakirschen vs Cerise Bigarreau Amarenakirschen vs Sauerkirschen Cerise Bigarreau vs Sauerkirschen Cerise Bigarreau vs Luxardo The Original Mar... Cerise Bigarreau vs Cerezas en almíbar denso Süßkirschen vs Cerise Bigarreau Cerise Bigarreau vs Cerises dénoyautées au s... Sauerkirschen vs Sauerkirschen