Amarenakirschen vs Luxardo The Original Maraschino Cherries
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amarenakirschen | Luxardo The Original Marasch... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 286 kcal | 296 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 54.6 g | 71 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amarenakirschen has 23% less sugar (54.6 g vs 71 g).
- Luxardo The Original Maraschino Cherries has 100% more protein (0.9 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Amarenakirschen
51% Sauerkirschen, Zucker, Wasser, Glukosesirup, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff: Anthocyane.
Luxardo The Original Maraschino Cherries
Ciliegie, zucchero, succo di marasche, sciroppo di glucosio-fruttosio, acqua, aromi naturali, acidificante: acido citrico, coloranti: antociani, E 120
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amarenakirschen or Luxardo The Original Maraschino Cherries?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amarenakirschen has fewer calories: 286 kcal versus 296 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amarenakirschen has less sugar: 54.6 g versus 71 g per 100 g.