Süßkirschen vs Amarenakirschen
Overall, Süßkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Süßkirschen
Amarenakirschen
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Süßkirschen | Amarenakirschen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 286 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 15.8 g | 54.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | — |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Süßkirschen has 70% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 286 kcal).
- Süßkirschen has 71% less sugar (15.8 g vs 54.6 g).
- Süßkirschen has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Süßkirschen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Süßkirschen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Süßkirschen
Süßkirschen, Wasser, Zucker, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure.
Amarenakirschen
51% Sauerkirschen, Zucker, Wasser, Glukosesirup, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff: Anthocyane.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Süßkirschen or Amarenakirschen?
Overall, Süßkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Süßkirschen has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 286 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Süßkirschen has less sugar: 15.8 g versus 54.6 g per 100 g.