Alaska-Seelachsfilet vs Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic
Overall, Alaska-Seelachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Alaska-Seelachsfilet
Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Alaska-Seelachsfilet | Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfil... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 110 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 5.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has 35% fewer calories (71 kcal vs 110 kcal).
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has 85% less fat (0.8 g vs 5.3 g).
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has no sugar, while Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has 1 g.
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has no salt, while Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has 0.8 g.
- Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has 31% more protein (16 g vs 11 g).
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Alaska-Seelachsfilet
Filets De Colin d'Alaska (Theragra Chalcogramma).
Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic
75% Alaska-Seelachsfilet, Wasser, Rapsöl, Weizenmehl, weiße Zwiebeln, 1,4% Zitronensaft aus Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Speisesalz, Gewürze (Zwiebelpulver, Knoblauchpulver, Paprika, Kurkuma), Stärke, 0,4% Petersilie, Hefe.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Alaska-Seelachsfilet or Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic?
Overall, Alaska-Seelachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alaska-Seelachsfilet has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 110 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alaska-Seelachsfilet has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.