6 Pork Shoulder Steaks vs Épaule cuite choix
Overall, 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks | Épaule cuite choix |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 127 kcal |
| Fat | 17.3 g | 5.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 27.2 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Épaule cuite choix has 53% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 270 kcal).
- Épaule cuite choix has 66% less fat (5.9 g vs 17.3 g).
- Épaule cuite choix has 62% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 6.1 g).
- 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has 67% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has 38% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0.5 g).
- 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has 38% more protein (27.2 g vs 17 g).
- 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
6 Pork Shoulder Steaks
British pork shoulder steaks
Épaule cuite choix
Viande de porc 82% (origine France), eau, sirop de glucose, sel, Énergie / Energy. gélatine de porc, dextrose, stabilisants: poly-tri - et diphosphates, exhausteur Matières grasses / Fat... de goût: glutamate de sodium, arôme naturel, antioxydant: érythorbate de
FAQ
Which is healthier: 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks or Épaule cuite choix?
Overall, 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Épaule cuite choix has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 270 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.