Comparison

6 Pork Shoulder Steaks vs Epaule Découennée Et Dégraissée, 10 Tranches

Overall, 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient6 Pork Shoulder SteaksEpaule Découennée Et Dégrais...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 270 kcal 127 kcal
Fat 17.3 g 5.9 g
Saturated fat 6.1 g 2.3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 2.5 g
Fiber 0.8 g —
Protein 27.2 g 17 g
Additives07
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Epaule Découennée Et Dégraissée, 10 Tranches has 53% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 270 kcal).
  • Epaule Découennée Et Dégraissée, 10 Tranches has 66% less fat (5.9 g vs 17.3 g).
  • Epaule Découennée Et Dégraissée, 10 Tranches has 62% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 6.1 g).
  • 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has 67% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
  • 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has 38% more protein (27.2 g vs 17 g).
  • 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

6 Pork Shoulder Steaks

British pork shoulder steaks

Epaule Découennée Et Dégraissée, 10 Tranches

Épaule de porc 84%, eau, sel, sirop de glucose, gélatine de porc, dextrose, stabilisants : E450-E451-E452, exhausteur de goût : E621 , arôme, antioxydant: érythorbate de sodium, conservateur: nitrite de sodium.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks or Epaule Découennée Et Dégraissée, 10 Tranches?

Overall, 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Epaule Découennée Et Dégraissée, 10 Tranches has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 270 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons