6 Pork Shoulder Steaks vs Dés d'épaule - 2x75g
Overall, 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks | Dés d'épaule - 2x75g |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 128 kcal |
| Fat | 17.3 g | 6 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 27.2 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dés d'épaule - 2x75g has 53% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 270 kcal).
- Dés d'épaule - 2x75g has 65% less fat (6 g vs 17.3 g).
- Dés d'épaule - 2x75g has 61% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 6.1 g).
- 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has 80% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 2 g).
- 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has 100% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0 g).
- 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has 41% more protein (27.2 g vs 16 g).
- 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Dés d'épaule - 2x75g lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
6 Pork Shoulder Steaks
British pork shoulder steaks
Dés d'épaule - 2x75g
Epaule de porc (Origine : France) 84%, eau, sel, dextrose de blé, arômes naturels, sirop de glucose de blé, stabilisants : tri et diphosphates de sodium, antioxydant : érythorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrites de sodium
FAQ
Which is healthier: 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks or Dés d'épaule - 2x75g?
Overall, 6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dés d'épaule - 2x75g has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 270 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
6 Pork Shoulder Steaks has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.