Comparison

5 Steaks de Porc (Sélection Fan de Barbecue) vs Rôti filet fumé de porc

Overall, 5 Steaks de Porc (Sélection Fan de Barbecue) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient5 Steaks de Porc (Sélection...Rôti filet fumé de porc
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 133 kcal 98 kcal
Fat 4 g 2 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0.2 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 2.7 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 24.1 g 20 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rôti filet fumé de porc has 26% fewer calories (98 kcal vs 133 kcal).
  • Rôti filet fumé de porc has 50% less fat (2 g vs 4 g).
  • Rôti filet fumé de porc has 47% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
  • 5 Steaks de Porc (Sélection Fan de Barbecue) has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.7 g).
  • 5 Steaks de Porc (Sélection Fan de Barbecue) has 17% more protein (24.1 g vs 20 g).
  • 5 Steaks de Porc (Sélection Fan de Barbecue) has the better Nutri-Score.
  • 5 Steaks de Porc (Sélection Fan de Barbecue) is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

5 Steaks de Porc (Sélection Fan de Barbecue)

100% filet de Porc. Viande de porc origine France.

Rôti filet fumé de porc

Carré de porc 87%, eau, sel, acidifiant : acétate de sodium, antioxygène : érythorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 5 Steaks de Porc (Sélection Fan de Barbecue) or Rôti filet fumé de porc?

Overall, 5 Steaks de Porc (Sélection Fan de Barbecue) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rôti filet fumé de porc has fewer calories: 98 kcal versus 133 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rôti filet fumé de porc has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons