3 Hearts Of Romaine vs Roma Salatherzen
Overall, Roma Salatherzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 3 Hearts Of Romaine | Roma Salatherzen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 24 kcal | 14 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Roma Salatherzen has 41% fewer calories (14 kcal vs 24 kcal).
- Roma Salatherzen has 66% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Roma Salatherzen has no sugar, while 3 Hearts Of Romaine has 2.4 g.
- 3 Hearts Of Romaine has 100% more protein (1.2 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
3 Hearts Of Romaine
Coeur de romaine
Roma Salatherzen
Mini Romana
FAQ
Which is healthier: 3 Hearts Of Romaine or Roma Salatherzen?
Overall, Roma Salatherzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roma Salatherzen has fewer calories: 14 kcal versus 24 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roma Salatherzen has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.