3 Hearts Of Romaine vs British Ruby Romaine Hearts
Overall, British Ruby Romaine Hearts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 3 Hearts Of Romaine | British Ruby Romaine Hearts |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 24 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- British Ruby Romaine Hearts has 53% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 24 kcal).
- British Ruby Romaine Hearts has 83% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- British Ruby Romaine Hearts has 40% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.4 g).
- British Ruby Romaine Hearts has 44% more fiber (2.1 g vs 1.2 g).
Ingredients
3 Hearts Of Romaine
Coeur de romaine
British Ruby Romaine Hearts
Romaine lettuce
FAQ
Which is healthier: 3 Hearts Of Romaine or British Ruby Romaine Hearts?
Overall, British Ruby Romaine Hearts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
British Ruby Romaine Hearts has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 24 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
British Ruby Romaine Hearts has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.