Comparison

15 bâtonnets panés de colin d'Alaska vs Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC

Overall, Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient15 bâtonnets panés de colin...Tranches panées de Colin d'A...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 163 kcal 173 kcal
Fat 5.1 g 6.5 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.5 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0.6 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.7 g 1 g
Protein 12 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, GlutenFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 15 bâtonnets panés de colin d'Alaska has 22% less fat (5.1 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 50% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 30% more fiber (1 g vs 0.7 g).

Ingredients

15 bâtonnets panés de colin d'Alaska

Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (POISSONS) 65% qualité sans arête* [Theragra chalcogramma sauvage, farine de BLÉ (GLUTEN), huile de colza, eau, amidons de pomme de terre et de BLÉ (GLUTEN), sel, GLUTEN de BLÉ, levure.

Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC

Colin d'Alaska 63%, chapelure 13% (farine de blé, sel, huile de colza, épices, levure), eau, huile de colza, farine de blé, amidons (pomme de terre, blé), farine d'épeautre complet, gluten de blé, sel, poivre noir 0,04%, extrait de poivre noir.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 15 bâtonnets panés de colin d'Alaska or Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC?

Overall, Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

15 bâtonnets panés de colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons