100% Cacao vs Edelbitter Mild 90%
Overall, 100% Cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 100% Cacao | Edelbitter Mild 90% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 614 kcal | 593 kcal |
| Fat | 54 g | 50 g |
| Saturated fat | 34 g | 30.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 7.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 15.3 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 11.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Edelbitter Mild 90% has 11% less saturated fat (30.2 g vs 34 g).
- 100% Cacao has 93% less sugar (0.5 g vs 7.4 g).
- Edelbitter Mild 90% has 100% more fiber (15.3 g vs 0 g).
- 100% Cacao has 12% more protein (13 g vs 11.5 g).
- 100% Cacao is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
100% Cacao
Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, fettarmer Kakao. Kann Schalenfrüchte, Milch und Soja enthalten.
Edelbitter Mild 90%
Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, fettarmes Kakaopulver, Zucker, Emulgator: Lecithine (Soja); Vanilleextrakt. Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten und Milch enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 100% Cacao or Edelbitter Mild 90%?
Overall, 100% Cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Edelbitter Mild 90% has fewer calories: 593 kcal versus 614 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
100% Cacao has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.